May 2, 2012
gunstreet:

suicideblonde:

Among the problems Nabokov’s Lolita poses for the book designer, probably the thorniest is the popular misconception of the title character. She’s chronically miscast as a teenage sexpot—just witness the dozens of soft-core covers over the years. “We are talking about a novel which has child rape at its core,” says John Bertram, an architect and blogger who, three years ago, sponsored a Lolita cover competition asking designers to do better.
Now the contest is being turned into a book, due out in June and coedited by Yuri Leving, with essays on historical cover treatments along with new versions by 60 well-known designers, two-thirds of them women: Barbara deWilde, Jessica Helfand, Peter Mendelsund, and Jennifer Daniel, to name a few. They don’t shy away from frank sexuality, but they add layers of darkness and complication. And like Jamie Keenan’s cover—a claustrophobic room that morphs into a girl in her underwear—they provoke without asking readers to abdicate their responsibility.
(via Recovering Lolita — Imprint-The Online Community for Graphic Designers)

I saw the movies before reading the book, and after reading the book I was maddened by the way the films portrayed Humbert as a fairly regular guy with a tragic past who just happened to fall in love with a young teenage girl. In the book he’s quite obviously a pedophile; what makes the book interesting (aside from Nabokov’s poetic way of storytelling) is the same thing that makes A Clockwork Orange interesting: it is told in a way that forces you to feel pity for someone who is clearly a villain.

I felt no pity for Lolita’s kidnapper and rapist. It took me ages to finish the book because I kept getting sick as Nabokov tried to romanticize child rape. It’s beautifully written, but the story is horrific. I hate the way society portrays Lolita as a tart, when she is truly the victim of a terrible man.
But, neat about the book coming out with (hopefully) improved cover ideas. :)

gunstreet:

suicideblonde:

Among the problems Nabokov’s Lolita poses for the book designer, probably the thorniest is the popular misconception of the title character. She’s chronically miscast as a teenage sexpot—just witness the dozens of soft-core covers over the years. “We are talking about a novel which has child rape at its core,” says John Bertram, an architect and blogger who, three years ago, sponsored a Lolita cover competition asking designers to do better.

Now the contest is being turned into a book, due out in June and coedited by Yuri Leving, with essays on historical cover treatments along with new versions by 60 well-known designers, two-thirds of them women: Barbara deWilde, Jessica Helfand, Peter Mendelsund, and Jennifer Daniel, to name a few. They don’t shy away from frank sexuality, but they add layers of darkness and complication. And like Jamie Keenan’s cover—a claustrophobic room that morphs into a girl in her underwear—they provoke without asking readers to abdicate their responsibility.

(via Recovering Lolita — Imprint-The Online Community for Graphic Designers)

I saw the movies before reading the book, and after reading the book I was maddened by the way the films portrayed Humbert as a fairly regular guy with a tragic past who just happened to fall in love with a young teenage girl. In the book he’s quite obviously a pedophile; what makes the book interesting (aside from Nabokov’s poetic way of storytelling) is the same thing that makes A Clockwork Orange interesting: it is told in a way that forces you to feel pity for someone who is clearly a villain.

I felt no pity for Lolita’s kidnapper and rapist. It took me ages to finish the book because I kept getting sick as Nabokov tried to romanticize child rape. It’s beautifully written, but the story is horrific. I hate the way society portrays Lolita as a tart, when she is truly the victim of a terrible man.

But, neat about the book coming out with (hopefully) improved cover ideas. :)

(via oldmoleskine)

  1. biggreendesign reblogged this from randomitus
  2. tearduck reblogged this from sleepysylph
  3. esmerose reblogged this from l0veology
  4. tongue-lash reblogged this from daddyfuckedme
  5. manlymenkissing reblogged this from youbutmostlyme
  6. platonicghost reblogged this from bloodyfawn
  7. bloodyrapounzel reblogged this from suicideblonde
  8. kid-fears reblogged this from youbutmostlyme
  9. the-fisher-queen reblogged this from annie-wyatt
  10. annie-wyatt reblogged this from youbutmostlyme
  11. youbutmostlyme reblogged this from lemondifficult
  12. cross-my-tea reblogged this from elidot and added:
    Really interesting read. My favourite is the hand and crumpled flower mainly because of the fonts and colours. My own...
  13. elidot reblogged this from -frabjousday
  14. speleothem reblogged this from suicideblonde
  15. meth-jesus reblogged this from tearduck
  16. kimberlykato reblogged this from sharingneedles
  17. pink-t0rnad0 reblogged this from drug-fairy
  18. handsforwings reblogged this from butterflyflutterbygoodbye
  19. madmike3000 reblogged this from cakebugs
  20. l0veology reblogged this from sharingneedles
  21. strawbones reblogged this from sharingneedles
  22. ifonlyshecouldfindherself reblogged this from drug-fairy
  23. unfetteredtypewriter reblogged this from sharingneedles
  24. higher-than-the-deepest-ocean reblogged this from sharingneedles
  25. lolita14 reblogged this from drug-fairy
  26. drug-fairy reblogged this from sharingneedles
  27. specimen6 reblogged this from sharingneedles
  28. cakebugs reblogged this from timewillnothavemercy
  29. timewillnothavemercy reblogged this from sharingneedles
  30. sharingneedles reblogged this from bloodyfawn
  31. adelaidehawke reblogged this from bloodyfawn